The Principal Bench of CAT in New Delhi right this moment allowed a candidate to sit in the TGT (Social Studies) interview by Navodaya Vidayalaya who was stopped from sitting in the interview illegally by the Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti.
Earlier, the Court had sought reply from the authorities and whereas listening to the ultimate arguments, it reversed the choice of the Navodaya Samiti and allowed the plea of the candidate and has allowed him to appear in the interview.
You have efficiently solid your vote
The candidate in the plea filed by advocate Harpreet Singh Hora has alleged that the workers illegally stopped him stating that he has scored lower than 50 per cent marks in the involved topics and thus, the act of the Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti by stopping such candidates is against the law and in opposition to the recruitment clauses of the notification of the Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti.
A Post Graduate candidate from Chhattisgarh had approached the CAT Delhi in opposition to the Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti alleging that regardless of clearing the Computer based mostly Test (CBT) held in September 2019, he was not allowed to appear in the interview of TGT (Social Studies) in January 2021.
It was said by the candidate in his plea that he’s a Post Graduate who additionally holds a B. Ed. and handed CTET examination and has bought greater than the required marks in commencement and thus, the act of the Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti by stopping such candidates is against the law and in opposition to the recruitment clauses of the notification of the Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti.
Terming the mentioned motion of the Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti as arbitrary, discriminatory, unlawful and in violative of the principles, the candidate had approached the Tribunal on the bottom that the Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti can’t inject a brand new rule in the rule-e-book by their very own whims and fancies and thus, he has prayed the Court to think about the applicant for appointment in the recruitment course of.
Petitioner had sought course to respondents to quash and put aside the order dated January 18 this yr in respect of the applicant and think about the applicant for appointment in the recruitment course of and cross orders to nominate petitioner’s title to NVS in the order of desire as per selection opted by him, for issuance of appointment letter with out additional delay defending his seniority with reference to his batch-mates.