PhD scholar Vikrant Singh had on October 29 final 12 months put up a submit on Facebook, reacting to the arrest of a JEE (Mains) topper from Assam for utilizing a proxy to jot down the examination. In that he had stated that the “problem of proxy isn’t a new thing”, and that the IITs have “acted in (a) vague and sad manner” in opposition to academics who’ve levelled allegations of corruption earlier. In specific, he talked about former IIT Kharagpur instructor Rajeev Kumar who had campaigned to reform the JEE course of, and Dr Brijesh Rai of IIT Guwahati who was punished with ‘compulsory retirement’ for levelling allegations of corruption within the entry course of.
In his submit, Singh, whereas lauding the arrest, had requested for stricter guidelines to cease this “unfair business”. Significantly, he took the lead in mobilising the coed fraternity to specific solidarity with Dr Rai.
An IIT Guwahati spokesperson, nevertheless, stated that Singh was in cahoots with Dr Rai, his former supervisor, in misrepresenting information in regards to the establishment “to disrupt the academic activities of the institute”. An announcement issued by IIT Guwahati on Monday clarified that Singh has been stored below “suspended academic expulsion” from March 10 till July 27. It added that his case was completely investigated by the scholars’ disciplinary committee and a call was arrived at after a number of and “detailed deliberations”.
IIT stated that Singh had shared his suspension discover with the media as an alternative of exploring any risk to attraction in opposition to it with the institute authorities. This was finished, they alleged, to defame the establishment.
The establishment additionally claimed that Singh had threatened a number of college members by letters and emails having objectionable and derogatory language, and instigated college students to organise strikes on campus.
Singh has hit again, calling his suspension an assault on his freedom of expression. “Since when has social media activity come under the purview of disciplinary proceedings? Politicians say whatever they want on public platforms, but a student cannot air his grievances anywhere. It seems that since they can misuse public money for court cases, they don’t fear any repercussions, and dare to behave unlawfully in the garb of disciplining students,” Singh stated.
IIT Guwahati stated Singh was repeatedly warned by the disciplinary committee and advised that the motion in opposition to him was taken not simply primarily based on one incident however in view of previous instances.
The establishment additionally stated that it permits a research scholar to decide on a doctoral supervisor primarily based on mutual settlement, however Singh didn’t select a brand new supervisor after his earlier information, Dr Rai, was compulsorily retired. “Further, Mr Vikrant is not a registered student of IIT-G since the last term as he has not yet completed his academic formalities,” the IIT assertion learn.