33 C
Mumbai
Wednesday, April 21, 2021
Home NEWS Mosque trustee questions ‘mischievous’ plea in SC

Mosque trustee questions ‘mischievous’ plea in SC

The trustee of a 350-year-old mosque in Lucknow has questioned a “mischievous” petition filed by a Supreme Court advocate which claims that “fundamentalist barbarians” invaded India and destroyed locations of worship.

The petition filed by advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay had additionally challenged a particular regulation — Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act of 1991 — which freezes the standing of locations of worship because it was on August 15, 1947. A Bench led by Chief Justice Sharad A. Bobde had determined to look at his petition and requested the federal government to reply.

Now, Wasif Hasan, the co-mutawalli of Teeleywali Masjid, mentioned Mr. Upadhyay’s petition was not primarily based on information, and in truth, its contents had been fairly “shocking”.

Mr. Hasan mentioned he’s already combating a swimsuit in Lucknow in opposition to events who declare {that a} temple as soon as stood the place the Teeleywali Masjid was constructed.

The claims in the swimsuit are usually not backed by historic information or data, he mentioned.

“This mischievous petition [of Mr. Upadhyay] intends to isolate the Muslim community from other religious communities in the country … The petition tries to create an allegedly factual case of fundamentalist barbarians coming to India and destroying places of worship. The petition is not backed by any facts, sources to support that any such place of worship was destroyed,” the applying mentioned.

Mr. Hasan urged the apex court docket to permit him to intervene and show that Mr. Upadhyay’s petition “creates a false narrative that Muslims and Christians are invaders and less a part of India than other communities.”

“Indians are as proud of the mosques of Lucknow and Delhi as they are of the temples of Haridwar and Badrinath. The churches of Goa are as dear to us as the Kamakhya temple in Assam. The Jama Masjid is a cultural centre that belongs to India, not only to the Muslims of India,” Mr. Hasan submitted in his software.

On March 12, the highest court docket had issued discover to the Union Ministries of Home, Law and Culture.

Mr. Upadhyay had submitted that the 1991 Act supplied an “arbitrary, irrational and retrospective” closing date which barred Hindus, Jains, Buddhists, and Sikhs from approaching courts to “reclaim” their locations of worship which had been “invaded” and “encroached” upon by “fundamentalist barbaric invaders.”

“The Act declared that character of places of worship-pilgrimage shall be maintained as it was on August 15, 1947 and no suit or proceeding shall lie in court in respect of disputes against encroachment done by fundamentalist barbaric invaders and law breakers and such proceeding shall stand abated,” the petition has mentioned.

Source link

Most Popular

EnglishGujaratiHindiMarathiUrdu