BJP chief Subramanian Swamy had filed a plea searching for a route to the Centre for declaring ‘Ram Sethu’ as a national heritage monument
The Supreme Court on Thursday mentioned it can hear on April 26 the plea of BJP leader Subramanian Swamy searching for a route to the Centre for declaring ‘Ram Sethu’ as a national heritage monument.
A bench comprising Chief Justice S.A. Bobde and Justices A.S. Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian was urged by Mr. Swamy that the plea wanted an pressing listening to.
The CJI, who would superannuate on April 23, mentioned,”let next CJI (Justice N.V. Ramana) deal with this issue. I do not have so much time. This issue requires time and I don’t have it.” The bench listed the matter on April 26 for listening to after the BJP chief submitted that this subject is pending for fairly very long time.
(*26*) on January 23, 2020, the apex courtroom had mentioned it can think about after three months the plea of Mr. Swamy on ‘Ram Sethu’ as a national heritage monument.
Ram Sethu, also called Adam’s bridge, is a sequence of limestone shoals between between Pamban Island, also called Rameswaram Island, off the south-eastern coast of Tamil Nadu, and Mannar Island, off the north-western coast of Sri Lanka.
The BJP chief had submitted that he has already received the primary spherical of the litigation through which the Centre accepted the existence of Ram Sethu.
He had additional mentioned the union minister involved had referred to as a gathering in 2017 to think about his demand to declare the Sethu as a national heritage monument however subsequently nothing occurred.
The high courtroom referred to pendency of a number of instances earlier than it and requested Mr. Swamy to point out his plea after three three months.
However, the case couldn’t be listed after three months because the apex courtroom began the listening to of pressing issues solely by means of video conferencing due to the COVID-19 pandemic and consequent lockdown.
The BJP chief had earlier raised the difficulty of declaring Ram Sethu as a national monument in his PIL towards the controversial Sethusamudram Ship Channel mission, initiated by the UPA-I authorities.
The matter had reached the apex courtroom, which in 2007 had stayed the work for the mission on the Ram Sethu.
The Centre had later mentioned that it thought of the “socio-economic disadvantages” of the mission and was prepared to discover one other route to the transport channel mission with out damaging the Ram Sethu.
“That the Government of India intends to explore an alternative to the earlier alignment of Sethusamudram Ship Channel project without affecting/damaging the Adam’s Bridge/Ram Sethu in the interest of the nation,” the affidavit filed by the ministry had mentioned.
The courtroom had then requested the federal government to file a recent affidavit.
The Sethusamudram transport channel mission has been dealing with protests from some political events, environmentalists and sure Hindu non secular teams.
Under the mission, a 83 km-long deep water channel was to be created, linking Mannar with Palk Strait, by in depth dredging and removing of limestone shoals.
The apex courtroom had on November 13, 2019 had granted six weeks to the Centre to make clear its stand on the Ram Sethu. It had additionally granted liberty to Mr. Swamy to method the courtroom if the response of the Centre was not filed.