It asks Centre to reply to petition, tags it with different pleas difficult farm legal guidelines.
The Supreme Court on Thursday challenged Congress MP from Kerala, T.N. Prathapan, to pick the particular provision within the new agriculture legal guidelines which says farmers won’t get Minimum Support Price (MSP) for his or her merchandise.
A 3-judge Bench led by Chief Justice Sharad A. Bobde questioned the MP after the latter’s lawyer submitted that “without MSP, farmers cannot survive”. Mr. Prathapan, in his petition, mentioned the regulation opens the door for “corporate greed of multi-national companies” to trample on agriculture market.
“So you want the old regime to continue… Show us the provision which withdraws MSP,” Chief Justice Bobde requested the parliamentarian’s lawyer.
The courtroom lastly requested the Centre to reply to the petition and tagged it with different pleas difficult the farm legal guidelines.
In his petition, Mr. Prathapan contended that the legal guidelines had been merely a ruse to subvert the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) system.
“Without the APMC acting as a protective shield around the farmers, the market would ultimately fall to the corporate greed of multinational companies who are more profit oriented and have no care for the conditions of the poverty stricken farmers who are dependent on farming for their livelihood,” the petition mentioned.
It mentioned the APMC deterred the exploitation of the farmers by offering MSP.
“Agriculture is characterised by fragmentation due to small holdings and has certain inherent weaknesses beyond control such as dependence on weather, uncertainties in production and an unpredictable market,” he defined in his petition.
The vagaries of climate and inherent handicaps make agriculture dangerous and inefficient in respect of each enter and output administration.
“These challenges cannot be addressed by way of monetisation of the farmer’s produce to increase the income. Instead, strengthening the existing APMC system by infusing more capital and effective management of MSP is the need of the hour. The promotion of agreements for farm produce will weaken the process of monetisation as per the current structure of The Farmers’ (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement of Price Assurance and Farm Services Act, 2020,” he submitted.
He mentioned 65.53% consists of rural inhabitants who relies on agriculture as their principal technique of livelihood.
“Thus, the common man, agriculture and the economy are umbilical to one another,” Mr. Prathapan has mentioned.
The enactment of the three controversial agriculture reform legal guidelines, which embrace The Farmers’ Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act and the Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act has seen hundreds of farmers protest on the Delhi borders for his or her repeal. Several makes an attempt at negotiations by the federal government have failed. Violence reached the ramparts of the Red Fort amid a tractor rally held by farmers on the Republic Day.