33 C
Mumbai
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
Home NEWS Supreme Court pulls up Centre for ‘routine affidavit’ on UPSC exams

Supreme Court pulls up Centre for ‘routine affidavit’ on UPSC exams

At what degree was determination taken to not give additional likelihood for aspirants, asks prime courtroom

The Supreme Court on Thursday mentioned an affidavit filed by the federal government didn’t specify the extent of authority at which the choice was taken to not give UPSC aspirants, together with “last-attempters” who claimed their preparations for the October 4 prelims had been severely restricted as a result of COVID-19 pandemic, one other likelihood to take the elite civil providers exams.

A Bench led by Justice A.M. Khanwilkar additionally famous that the affidavit gave the impression to be a “routine” one filed by an Under Secretary.

The courtroom mentioned the choice ought to have been taken on the highest degree.

“It is a policy decision and a one-time decision. This is a routine affidavit. Is this the way to do this?” the Bench requested Additional Solicitor-General S.V. Raju.

Justice Khanwilkar mentioned the courtroom would have most well-liked an affidavit from the next official. Mr. Raju agreed to file one other affidavit.

The courtroom scheduled the case for listening to on January 29.

Senior advocate C.U. Singh, for the aspirants, mentioned there was a scarcity of readability on the difficulty from the federal government.

A 13-page affidavit filed by an Under Secretary with the Department of Personnel and Training just lately mentioned it was “curious to note that the petitioners, who participated in the examination with open eyes, only approached the Supreme Court after the results of the examination were declared”.

“Be that as it may, it is submitted the UPSC made all the necessary arrangements for the conduct of CS (Preliminary) Examination-2020 on October 4 last year, in a safe and efficient manner adhering to all the COVID-19 safety protocols,” the federal government had mentioned.

‘Differential treatment’

Giving a further try or rest in age for some candidates would quantity to extending differential therapy. It would result in an “un-levelling of the playing field”, the affidavit had mentioned.

“Providing an extra attempt could further have a cascading effect by creating a ground for challenge on the part of those candidates who have already appeared for the Civil Services (Preliminary) Examination-2020. It is submitted that other non-final-attempt candidates, who undertook the examination this year without any murmur of discontent, would be disadvantageously placed in future examinations,” the federal government had mentioned.

A complete of 4,86,952 candidates had appeared within the CS (Preliminary) Examination-2020 on October 4.

The UPSC had allowed candidates to vary their centres to facilitate candidates who had moved to a special location owing to the pandemic. The rivalry that the pandemic had added to the candidates’ stress and hampered their preparations held no floor because the examination had already been postponed from May to October, giving college students extra time to arrange, the Centre had submitted.

“Furthermore, these conditions would have affected every candidate at the examination in a similar way, thus still maintaining a balance amongst all the candidates,” the affidavit mentioned.

The authorities additionally identified that examination was held within the fifth section of ‘Unlock.’ Most of the restrictions had been eliminated by then.

On January 22, the federal government, for the primary time, informed the courtroom that it was “not agreeable” to present aspirants one other crack on the exams for the elite civil providers. The courtroom had requested the federal government to make its stand clear in an affidavit by January 25.

The January 22 revelation from the federal government had come after weeks of telling the courtroom {that a} determination to grant one other likelihood for UPSC aspirants was below “active consideration”.

The case relies on a petition filed by a number of aspirants, represented by advocate Anushree Prashit Kapadia, who had appeared within the UPSC prelims on October 4.

They had sought one other shot on the exams in view of “innumerable, inevitable circumstances suffered by them due to COVID-19 pandemic, which prevailed in the entire country during the crucial period of their preparation and even on the date of examination”.

You have reached your restrict for free articles this month.

Subscription Benefits Include

Today’s Paper

Find mobile-friendly model of articles from the day’s newspaper in a single easy-to-read record.

Unlimited Access

Enjoy studying as many articles as you want with none limitations.

Personalised suggestions

A choose record of articles that match your pursuits and tastes.

Faster pages

Move easily between articles as our pages load immediately.

Dashboard

A one-stop-shop for seeing the most recent updates, and managing your preferences.

Briefing

We transient you on the most recent and most essential developments, thrice a day.

Support Quality Journalism.

*Our Digital Subscription plans don’t at present embrace the e-paper, crossword and print.

Source link

Most Popular

EnglishGujaratiHindiMarathiUrdu