33 C
Mumbai
Friday, February 26, 2021
Home NEWS Why UPSC candidates who missed last attempt can't be given another likelihood,...

Why UPSC candidates who missed last attempt can’t be given another likelihood, SC asks Centre

Why UPSC candidates who missed last attempt can’t be given another likelihood, SC asks Centre
Image Source : INDIA TV

Why UPSC candidates who missed last attempt can’t be given another likelihood, SC asks Centre

The Supreme Court Friday requested the Centre as to why one-time leisure can not be given to civil companies aspirants who couldn’t seem for his or her last attempt in 2020 as a result of COVID-19 pandemic by giving them an additional likelihood. A bench of Justices AM Khanwilkar, BR Gavai and Krishna Murari requested Additional Solicitor General SV Raju to apprise it by February 1 on what number of candidate would seem if one-time leisure is given and what number of occasions it has been completed because the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) was established.

“It’s just a one-time relaxation and if it has been done before then why not this time”, the bench instructed Raju.

The prime courtroom requested Centre to not concern any notification for 2021 UPSC examination until February 1 and mentioned that it was not asking to extend the age-limit of candidates however the request is being made that one-time concession be given to these who have exhausted all their makes an attempt.

Senior advocate Shyam Divan and advocate Anushree Prashit Kapadia appeared for petitioner Rachna and others searching for grant of yet one more likelihood within the UPSC’s civil companies examination to these aspirants who couldn’t seem of their last attempt in 2020 as a result of pandemic.

On Thursday, the highest courtroom had questioned the Centre for submitting an affidavit with out specifying at whose degree the choice was taken for not granting yet one more alternative to UPSC civil companies aspirants who couldn’t seem of their last attempt in 2020 examination as a consequence of COVID-19 pandemic.

The prime courtroom had mentioned that the affidavit filed earlier than it was not clear about at whose degree this resolution was taken and noticed {that a} “routine” affidavit has been filed earlier than it by an under-secretary degree officer.

On January 25, the Centre had instructed the apex courtroom that permitting further attempt in UPSC civil companies examination to these who couldn’t seem of their last likelihood in 2020 as a consequence of COVID-19 would create a “cascading effect”, detrimental to the general functioning and degree taking part in area obligatory for a public examination system.

In an affidavit filed within the apex courtroom, the Centre had mentioned that giving a further attempt or leisure in age for some candidates would quantity to extending differential remedy to equally positioned aspirants on the examination.

“It is due to this fact respectfully submitted that accommodating the current petitioners would create a cascading impact detrimental to the general functioning and degree taking part in area essential to be offered in any public examination system,” mentioned the affidavit, filed by an under-secretary within the Department of Personnel and Training.

The Centre mentioned, “It may be noted that providing an extra attempt could further have a cascading effect by creating a ground for challenge on part of those candidates who have already appeared for the CS (Preliminary) Examination-2020.”

It had mentioned a complete of 4,86,952 candidates appeared within the October 4, last 12 months examination and the UPSC had “left no stone unturned in their pursuit to accommodate for the means and interests of the candidates.”

“It is further submitted that the contention by the petitioners that their preparation was hampered due to the stress caused by the prevailing COVID-19 pandemic, does not hold weight as the UPSC had already given extra time to the candidates by postponing the CS (preliminary) examination-2020 from May 31, 2020 to October 4, 2020,” it had mentioned, including that these situations would have affected each candidate on the examination in the same means.

The affidavit had mentioned that different non-final attempt candidates, who undertook the examination “without any murmur of discontent”, would be disadvantageously positioned in future examinations if the reduction prayed for by the petitioners is granted as it will allow huge variety of skilled candidates to take part once more, thereby making the long run examination excessively aggressive.

The prime courtroom on September 30 last 12 months had refused to postpone the UPSC civil companies preliminary examination, which was held on October 4, due to the COVID-19 pandemic and floods in a number of components of the nation.

However, it had directed the central authorities and the UPSC to think about granting an additional likelihood to candidates who in any other case have their last attempt in 2020, with corresponding extension of the higher age-limit. 

Latest India News



Source link

Most Popular

EnglishGujaratiHindiMarathiUrdu